[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2376517.GXv6XVOdDd@wuerfel>
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 22:31:30 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>, zajec5@...il.com,
leoli@...escale.com, qiang.zhao@...escale.com,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, scottwood@...escale.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net
Subject: Re: [v5.1] ucc_fast: Fix to avoid IS_ERR_VALUE abuses and dead code on 64bit systems.
On Thursday, August 4, 2016 10:22:43 PM CEST Arvind Yadav wrote:
> index df8ea79..ada9070 100644
> --- a/include/soc/fsl/qe/ucc_fast.h
> +++ b/include/soc/fsl/qe/ucc_fast.h
> @@ -165,10 +165,12 @@ struct ucc_fast_private {
> int stopped_tx; /* Whether channel has been stopped for Tx
> (STOP_TX, etc.) */
> int stopped_rx; /* Whether channel has been stopped for Rx */
> - u32 ucc_fast_tx_virtual_fifo_base_offset;/* pointer to base of Tx
> - virtual fifo */
> - u32 ucc_fast_rx_virtual_fifo_base_offset;/* pointer to base of Rx
> - virtual fifo */
> + unsigned long ucc_fast_tx_virtual_fifo_base_offset;/* pointer to base of
> + * Tx virtual fifo
> + */
> + unsigned long ucc_fast_rx_virtual_fifo_base_offset;/* pointer to base of
> + * Rx virtual fifo
> + */
> #ifdef STATISTICS
> u32 tx_frames; /* Transmitted frames counter. */
> u32 rx_frames; /* Received frames counter (only frames
>
This change seems ok, but what about the other u32 variables in ucc_geth.c
that get checked for IS_ERR_VALUE?
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists