[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57A452E0.10904@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:18:32 +0530
From: arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc: zajec5@...il.com, leoli@...escale.com, qiang.zhao@...escale.com,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, scottwood@...escale.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net
Subject: Re: [v5.1] ucc_fast: Fix to avoid IS_ERR_VALUE abuses and dead code
on 64bit systems.
On Friday 05 August 2016 02:01 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday, August 4, 2016 10:22:43 PM CEST Arvind Yadav wrote:
>> index df8ea79..ada9070 100644
>> --- a/include/soc/fsl/qe/ucc_fast.h
>> +++ b/include/soc/fsl/qe/ucc_fast.h
>> @@ -165,10 +165,12 @@ struct ucc_fast_private {
>> int stopped_tx; /* Whether channel has been stopped for Tx
>> (STOP_TX, etc.) */
>> int stopped_rx; /* Whether channel has been stopped for Rx */
>> - u32 ucc_fast_tx_virtual_fifo_base_offset;/* pointer to base of Tx
>> - virtual fifo */
>> - u32 ucc_fast_rx_virtual_fifo_base_offset;/* pointer to base of Rx
>> - virtual fifo */
>> + unsigned long ucc_fast_tx_virtual_fifo_base_offset;/* pointer to base of
>> + * Tx virtual fifo
>> + */
>> + unsigned long ucc_fast_rx_virtual_fifo_base_offset;/* pointer to base of
>> + * Rx virtual fifo
>> + */
>> #ifdef STATISTICS
>> u32 tx_frames; /* Transmitted frames counter. */
>> u32 rx_frames; /* Received frames counter (only frames
>>
> This change seems ok, but what about the other u32 variables in ucc_geth.c
> that get checked for IS_ERR_VALUE?
>
> Arnd
> I have send separate patch for ucc_geth ans ucc_slow.
> -Arvind
Powered by blists - more mailing lists