[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CO2PR11MB0088F3E8187DAC13B3FED31E97070@CO2PR11MB0088.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 17:07:34 +0000
From: Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com>
To: Raghu Vatsavayi <rvatsavayi@...iumnetworks.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Derek Chickles <derek.chickles@...iumnetworks.com>,
Satanand Burla <satananda.burla@...iumnetworks.com>,
Felix Manlunas <felix.manlunas@...iumnetworks.com>,
Raghu Vatsavayi <raghu.vatsavayi@...iumnetworks.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 10/18] liquidio support for new device cn23xx
> + /** Complete DPI init is done at firmware level. */
> + /*cn23xx_set_dpi_regs(oct);*/
Should be removed?
> +int cn23xx_fw_lock(struct octeon_device *oct)
> +{
> + dev_dbg(&oct->pci_dev->dev, "%s : PF = %d\n", __func__, oct-
> >pf_num);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int cn23xx_fw_unlock(struct octeon_device *oct)
> +{
> + dev_dbg(&oct->pci_dev->dev, "%s : PF = %d\n", __func__, oct-
> >pf_num);
> + return 0;
> +}
A bit odd that you have lock/unlock functions that only print.
Are you later extending them?
> + if (!(OCTEON_CN23XX_PF(oct)) ||
> + (OCTEON_CN23XX_PF(oct) && (oct->octeon_id == 0)))
Can simply be
If (!(OCTEON_CN23XX_PF(oct) || !oct->octeon_id)
> + if (!cn23xx_fw_loaded(octeon_dev)) {
> + fw_loaded = 0;
> + /* Do a soft reset of the Octeon device. */
I can never remember - are empty lines prior to comments
nice-to-have or a style requirement?
> + }
> + /*Lock again soft reset equivalent to unlock */
Likewise
> + if ((!OCTEON_CN23XX_PF(octeon_dev)) ||
> + (OCTEON_CN23XX_PF(octeon_dev) && !fw_loaded)) {
If (!A || (A && !B)) == (!A || !B)
> + if (ddr_timeout == 0) {
If (!ddr_timeout)
> + while (ddr_timeout == 0) {
Likewise
> + if (octeon_wait_for_bootloader(octeon_dev, 1000) != 0) {
No need for `!= 0`
Powered by blists - more mailing lists