[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <trinity-1978b11f-5ee9-4e10-b88d-ab126cd976e0-1471033378842@3capp-gmx-bs27>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 22:22:58 +0200
From: "Lino Sanfilippo" <LinoSanfilippo@....de>
To: "Timur Tabi" <timur@...eaurora.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, sdharia@...eaurora.org,
shankerd@...eaurora.org, vikrams@...eaurora.org,
cov@...eaurora.org, gavidov@...eaurora.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
andrew@...n.ch, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, mlangsdo@...hat.com,
jcm@...hat.com, agross@...eaurora.org, davem@...emloft.net,
f.fainelli@...il.com
Subject: Aw: [PATCH] [v8] net: emac: emac gigabit ethernet controller driver
Hi,
I really dont want to be a killjoy, but...
> + int ret;
> +
> + skb = __netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(adpt->netdev,
> + adpt->rxbuf_size, GFP_KERNEL);
This is also called in softirq context by the napi handler in which GFP_KERNEL is
not allowed.
You can either extend the refill function by one gfp_t parameter and then call it
with GFP_KERNEL for the initial rx buffer allocation when the hw is brought up and
then with GFP_ATOMIC for refilling in the NAPI handler. Or simply always use GFP_ATOMIC.
In the latter case the additional parameter is not needed of course and you can
use netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align() instead of __netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align().
Regards,
Lino
Powered by blists - more mailing lists