[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFz-TaU=C47Rna4b_pibKPfabXWtt88gaqWkUdcN9ay9nQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 10:12:08 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@...eradapt.com>,
CAI Qian <caiqian@...hat.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@...ileactivedefense.com>,
Eric Sandeen <esandeen@...hat.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: possible circular locking dependency detected
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> It's very much _not_ just overlayfs being pathological - that it certainly is,
> but the problem is much wider.
Al, can you take a look at my two patches, and see if you agree that
they fix it, though?
Of course, we now have *another* splice deadlock. That pipe inode is
nasty, it's very easy to deadlock on it in subtle ways.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists