netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next V2 3/6] net/mlx5e: Read ETS settings directly from firmware

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJ3xEMiwKF9gLXx+uzPoHdg1O7HijPy0zSMTj25sh+jXqFW4CQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 6 Sep 2016 19:26:08 +0300
From:   Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
To:     Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        Huy Nguyen <huyn@...lanox.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 3/6] net/mlx5e: Read ETS settings directly
 from firmware

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com> wrote:
> From: Huy Nguyen <huyn@...lanox.com>
>
> Issue description:
> Current implementation saves the ETS settings from user in
> a temporal soft copy and returns this settings when user
> queries the ETS settings.
>
> With the new DCBX firmware, the ETS settings can be changed
> by firmware when the DCBX is in firmware controlled mode. Therefore,
> user will obtain wrong values from the temporal soft copy.

Can this happen also with V2? I thought that when you dropped the
private flag it means that this hybrid mode
isn't exposed now, please clarify.