[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1473257660.10725.25.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2016 07:14:20 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Hadar Hen Zion <hadarh@...lanox.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>, Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>,
Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Amir Vadai <amirva@...lanox.com>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>, Amir Vadai <amir@...ai.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V6 4/4] net/sched: Introduce act_tunnel_key
On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 11:08 +0300, Hadar Hen Zion wrote:
> From: Amir Vadai <amir@...ai.me>
>
> +static int tunnel_key_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
> + struct nlattr *est, struct tc_action **a,
> + int ovr, int bind)
> +{
> + struct tc_action_net *tn = net_generic(net, tunnel_key_net_id);
> + struct nlattr *tb[TCA_TUNNEL_KEY_MAX + 1];
> + struct metadata_dst *metadata = NULL;
> + struct tc_tunnel_key *parm;
> + struct tcf_tunnel_key *t;
> + struct tcf_tunnel_key_params *params_old;
> + struct tcf_tunnel_key_params *params_new;
> + __be64 key_id;
> + bool exists = false;
> + int ret = 0;
> + int err;
We try for new code to avoid reverse Christmas tree ;)
->
+ struct tc_action_net *tn = net_generic(net, tunnel_key_net_id);
+ struct nlattr *tb[TCA_TUNNEL_KEY_MAX + 1];
+ struct tcf_tunnel_key_params *params_old;
+ struct tcf_tunnel_key_params *params_new;
+ struct metadata_dst *metadata = NULL;
+ struct tc_tunnel_key *parm;
+ struct tcf_tunnel_key *t;
+ bool exists = false;
+ __be64 key_id;
+ int ret = 0;
+ int err;
Other than this, code looks fine to me, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists