netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: skbuff: Fix length validation in skb_vlan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <57DFD8A1.1090103@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Mon, 19 Sep 2016 14:22:57 +0200
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>,
        pravin shelar <pshelar@....org>
CC:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: skbuff: Fix length validation in skb_vlan_pop()

On 09/19/2016 08:15 AM, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 13:26:30 -0700, pshelar@....org wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 3:09 AM, Shmulik Ladkani
>> <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com> wrote:
>>> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
>>> index 1e329d4112..cc2c004838 100644
>>> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
>>> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
>>> @@ -4537,7 +4537,7 @@ int skb_vlan_pop(struct sk_buff *skb)
>>>          } else {
>>>                  if (unlikely((skb->protocol != htons(ETH_P_8021Q) &&
>>>                                skb->protocol != htons(ETH_P_8021AD)) ||
>>> -                            skb->len < VLAN_ETH_HLEN))
>>> +                            skb->mac_len < VLAN_ETH_HLEN))
>>
>> There is already check in __skb_vlan_pop() to validate skb for a vlan
>> header. So it is safe to drop this check entirely.
>
> Seems validation in '__skb_vlan_pop' has slightly different semantics:
>
> 	unsigned int offset = skb->data - skb_mac_header(skb);
>
> 	__skb_push(skb, offset);
> 	err = skb_ensure_writable(skb, VLAN_ETH_HLEN);
>
> this pushes 'data' back to mac_header, then makes sure there's sufficient
> place in skb to _store_ VLAN_ETH_HLEN bytes (by pulling into linear part
> if needed, or erroring if skb is too small).

Yes, but this skb_ensure_writable() is needed for doing the memmove anyway.

> There's no guarantee the original mac header was sized VLAN_ETH_HLEN.

I'm wondering, what happens when you'd call this on tx path, when you'd
change that to suggested skb->mac_len? Isn't that 0 in such case, thus
such setups could fail then?