netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: skbuff: Fix length validation in skb_vlan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160919091538.56defd2b@pixies>
Date:   Mon, 19 Sep 2016 09:15:38 +0300
From:   Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>
To:     pravin shelar <pshelar@....org>
Cc:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: skbuff: Fix length validation in skb_vlan_pop()

Hi,

On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 13:26:30 -0700, pshelar@....org wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 3:09 AM, Shmulik Ladkani
> <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com> wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> > index 1e329d4112..cc2c004838 100644
> > --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> > +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> > @@ -4537,7 +4537,7 @@ int skb_vlan_pop(struct sk_buff *skb)
> >         } else {
> >                 if (unlikely((skb->protocol != htons(ETH_P_8021Q) &&
> >                               skb->protocol != htons(ETH_P_8021AD)) ||
> > -                            skb->len < VLAN_ETH_HLEN))
> > +                            skb->mac_len < VLAN_ETH_HLEN))
> 
> There is already check in __skb_vlan_pop() to validate skb for a vlan
> header. So it is safe to drop this check entirely.

Seems validation in '__skb_vlan_pop' has slightly different semantics:

	unsigned int offset = skb->data - skb_mac_header(skb);

	__skb_push(skb, offset);
	err = skb_ensure_writable(skb, VLAN_ETH_HLEN);

this pushes 'data' back to mac_header, then makes sure there's sufficient
place in skb to _store_ VLAN_ETH_HLEN bytes (by pulling into linear part
if needed, or erroring if skb is too small).

There's no guarantee the original mac header was sized VLAN_ETH_HLEN.

Interpretation of the following 

		if (unlikely((skb->protocol != htons(ETH_P_8021Q) &&
			      skb->protocol != htons(ETH_P_8021AD)) ||
			     skb->len < VLAN_ETH_HLEN))
			return 0;

in 'skb_vlan_pop' might be read as:
"there's no tag, or protocol says its a tag but it's insufficient to pop,
 so lets do nothing".

Is it superflous?

Thanks,
Shmulik