[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALx6S35K5BcMeVtgVZXJNYT51Lho7ZT4xY5ZU5mhYVC9vUwzfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:17:43 -0700
From: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/7] rhashtable: abstract out function to get hash
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 07:58:03PM +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:
>>
>> I understand this particular patch as an effort not to duplicate
>> hash function selection such as jhash vs jhash2 based on key_len.
>
> If the rhashtable params stay non-const as is then this is going
> to produce some monstrous code which will be worse than using
> jhash unconditionally.
>
I will look at keep params constant.
Tom
> If the rhashtable params are made const then you'll already know
> whether jhash or jhash2 is used.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
> PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists