[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160928122835.GB22809@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 14:28:35 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/6] net: phy: Threaded interrupts allow some
simplification
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 03:13:46PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 9/28/2016 2:46 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>
> >>The PHY interrupts are now handled in a threaded interrupt handler,
> >>which can sleep. The work queue is no longer needed, phy_change() can
> >>be called directly. Additionally, none of the callers of
> >>phy_mac_interrupt() did so in interrupt context, so fully remove the
> >
> > I did intend to call it from interrupt context (from the ravb driver).
> >
> >>work queue, and document that phy_mac_interrupt() should not be called
> >>in interrupt context.
> >
> > It was intentionally made callable from the interrupt context, I'd prefer
> >if you wouldn't change that.
>
> OTOH, it's still not very handy to call because of the 'new_link'
> parameter which I'm not sure I can provide...
Hi Sergei
If there is a need for it, i will leave the work queue and keep this
code unchanged.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists