[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <891f6b60-47a0-ba03-d6d3-8284993d1896@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 16:38:20 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/6] net: phy: Threaded interrupts allow some
simplification
On 09/28/2016 03:28 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>>> The PHY interrupts are now handled in a threaded interrupt handler,
>>>> which can sleep. The work queue is no longer needed, phy_change() can
>>>> be called directly. Additionally, none of the callers of
>>>> phy_mac_interrupt() did so in interrupt context, so fully remove the
>>>
>>> I did intend to call it from interrupt context (from the ravb driver).
>>>
>>>> work queue, and document that phy_mac_interrupt() should not be called
>>>> in interrupt context.
>>>
>>> It was intentionally made callable from the interrupt context, I'd prefer
>>> if you wouldn't change that.
>>
>> OTOH, it's still not very handy to call because of the 'new_link'
>> parameter which I'm not sure I can provide...
>
> Hi Sergei
>
> If there is a need for it, i will leave the work queue and keep this
> code unchanged.
Let's hear what Florian says...
> Andrew
MBR, Sergei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists