[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <06bdfcb4-8bb6-28e6-00e5-2518f79f729d@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 10:14:21 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/6] net: phy: Threaded interrupts allow some
simplification
On 09/28/2016 06:38 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 09/28/2016 03:28 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>
>>>>> The PHY interrupts are now handled in a threaded interrupt handler,
>>>>> which can sleep. The work queue is no longer needed, phy_change() can
>>>>> be called directly. Additionally, none of the callers of
>>>>> phy_mac_interrupt() did so in interrupt context, so fully remove the
>>>>
>>>> I did intend to call it from interrupt context (from the ravb
>>>> driver).
>>>>
>>>>> work queue, and document that phy_mac_interrupt() should not be called
>>>>> in interrupt context.
>>>>
>>>> It was intentionally made callable from the interrupt context, I'd
>>>> prefer
>>>> if you wouldn't change that.
>>>
>>> OTOH, it's still not very handy to call because of the 'new_link'
>>> parameter which I'm not sure I can provide...
>>
>> Hi Sergei
>>
>> If there is a need for it, i will leave the work queue and keep this
>> code unchanged.
>
> Let's hear what Florian says...
The intent is really to have phy_mac_interrupt() callable from hard IRQ
context, not that this matters really too much because link events
already occur in the slow path, but it's nice to have that property
retained IMHO.
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists