[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161003.215200.2029190598743365433.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 21:52:00 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: baoyou.xie@...aro.org
Cc: yisen.zhuang@...wei.com, salil.mehta@...wei.com,
yankejian@...wei.com, huangdaode@...ilicon.com,
lisheng011@...wei.com, xieqianqian@...wei.com, fabf@...net.be,
lipeng321@...wei.com, colin.king@...onical.com,
simon.horman@...ronome.com, arnd@...db.de, andrew@...n.ch,
ivecera@...hat.com, chenny.xu@...wei.com, xypron.glpk@....de,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xie.baoyou@....com.cn, han.fei@....com.cn, tang.qiang007@....com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net: hns: mark symbols static where possible
From: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@...aro.org>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2016 16:15:26 +0800
> We get a few warnings when building kernel with W=1:
...
> In fact, these functions are only used in the file in which they are
> declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static.
> So this patch marks these functions with 'static'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@...aro.org>
Still doesn't apply to net-next.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists