netdev - Re: [PATCH] qed: Fix to use list_for_each_entry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20161013.104049.1688046385759378480.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Thu, 13 Oct 2016 10:40:49 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     Yuval.Mintz@...ium.com
Cc:     weiyj.lk@...il.com, Ariel.Elior@...gic.com, weiyongjun1@...wei.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] qed: Fix to use list_for_each_entry_safe() when delete
 items

From: "Mintz, Yuval" <Yuval.Mintz@...ium.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 14:14:40 +0000

>> > Since we will remove items off the list using list_del() we need to
>> > use a safe version of the list_for_each_entry() macro aptly named
>> > list_for_each_entry_safe().
>> >
>> > Fixes: 0a7fb11c23c0 ("qed: Add Light L2 support")
>> > Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>
>> 
>> Can the QED maintainers please review this simple fix?
>> 
>> In my opinion 4 days is sufficient time in which to expect a reasonable review to
>> occur, let me know if you disagree. :-)
> 
> Sorry about that; The high holy days are killing our productivity. :-(
> I did ACK v1, though [and v2 was purely semantic change].

Indeed, I just noticed that, thanks!