netdev - RE: [PATCH] qed: Fix to use list_for_each_entry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 13 Oct 2016 14:14:40 +0000
From:   "Mintz, Yuval" <Yuval.Mintz@...ium.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "weiyj.lk@...il.com" <weiyj.lk@...il.com>
CC:     "Ariel.Elior@...gic.com" <Ariel.Elior@...gic.com>,
        "weiyongjun1@...wei.com" <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] qed: Fix to use list_for_each_entry_safe() when delete
 items

> > Since we will remove items off the list using list_del() we need to
> > use a safe version of the list_for_each_entry() macro aptly named
> > list_for_each_entry_safe().
> >
> > Fixes: 0a7fb11c23c0 ("qed: Add Light L2 support")
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>
> 
> Can the QED maintainers please review this simple fix?
> 
> In my opinion 4 days is sufficient time in which to expect a reasonable review to
> occur, let me know if you disagree. :-)

Sorry about that; The high holy days are killing our productivity. :-(
I did ACK v1, though [and v2 was purely semantic change].