netdev - Re: [PATCH] qed: Fix to use list_for_each_entry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20161013.094725.657883863089600176.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Thu, 13 Oct 2016 09:47:25 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     weiyj.lk@...il.com
Cc:     Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com, Ariel.Elior@...gic.com,
        weiyongjun1@...wei.com, everest-linux-l2@...gic.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] qed: Fix to use list_for_each_entry_safe() when delete
 items

From: Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@...il.com>
Date: Sun,  9 Oct 2016 13:32:22 +0000

> From: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>
> 
> Since we will remove items off the list using list_del() we need
> to use a safe version of the list_for_each_entry() macro aptly named
> list_for_each_entry_safe().
> 
> Fixes: 0a7fb11c23c0 ("qed: Add Light L2 support")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>

Can the QED maintainers please review this simple fix?

In my opinion 4 days is sufficient time in which to expect a
reasonable review to occur, let me know if you disagree. :-)