netdev - Re: [PATCHv2 net] sctp: return back transport in __sctp_rcv_init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20161031.155348.689672413057243931.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Mon, 31 Oct 2016 15:53:48 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     lucien.xin@...il.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
        marcelo.leitner@...il.com, vyasevich@...il.com,
        nhorman@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net] sctp: return back transport in
 __sctp_rcv_init_lookup

From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 00:42:35 +0800

> Prior to this patch, it used a local variable to save the transport that is
> looked up by __sctp_lookup_association(), and didn't return it back. But in
> sctp_rcv, it is used to initialize chunk->transport. So when hitting this,
> even if it found the transport, it was still initializing chunk->transport
> with null instead.
> 
> This patch is to return the transport back through transport pointer
> that is from __sctp_rcv_lookup_harder().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>

So do I apply this to 'net'?  If so I'd like to see explicit ACKs.

Thanks.