netdev - Re: [PATCHv2 net] sctp: return back transport in __sctp_rcv_init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161031201302.GB8514@localhost.localdomain>
Date:   Mon, 31 Oct 2016 18:13:02 -0200
From:   marcelo.leitner@...il.com
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     lucien.xin@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, vyasevich@...il.com,
        nhorman@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net] sctp: return back transport in
 __sctp_rcv_init_lookup

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 03:53:48PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
> Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 00:42:35 +0800
> 
> > Prior to this patch, it used a local variable to save the transport that is
> > looked up by __sctp_lookup_association(), and didn't return it back. But in
> > sctp_rcv, it is used to initialize chunk->transport. So when hitting this,
> > even if it found the transport, it was still initializing chunk->transport
> > with null instead.
> > 
> > This patch is to return the transport back through transport pointer
> > that is from __sctp_rcv_lookup_harder().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
> 
> So do I apply this to 'net'?  If so I'd like to see explicit ACKs.
> 
> Thanks.

No. Xin reposted the patchset with this patch updated instead, so please
ignore this one. Thanks.

Patchset named: [PATCHv2 net 0/3] sctp: a bunch of fixes by holding transport