lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <db922fb9-2553-7801-d597-0f40999be944@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Nov 2016 18:08:25 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To:     Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
        YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <hideaki.yoshifuji@...aclelinux.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Why are IPv6 host and anycast routes referencing lo device?


Can anyone explain why host routes and anycast routes for IPv6 are added with the device set to loopback versus the device with the address:

local ::1 dev lo  proto none  metric 0  pref medium
local 2000:1:: dev lo  proto none  metric 0  pref medium
local 2000:1::3 dev lo  proto none  metric 0  pref medium
local 2100:2:: dev lo  proto none  metric 0  pref medium
local 2100:2::3 dev lo  proto none  metric 0  pref medium


This behavior differs from IPv4 where host routes use the device with the address:

broadcast 10.1.1.0 dev eth0  proto kernel  scope link  src 10.1.1.3
local 10.1.1.3 dev eth0  proto kernel  scope host  src 10.1.1.3
broadcast 10.1.1.255 dev eth0  proto kernel  scope link  src 10.1.1.3
broadcast 10.100.2.0 dev eth2  proto kernel  scope link  src 10.100.2.3
local 10.100.2.3 dev eth2  proto kernel  scope host  src 10.100.2.3
broadcast 10.100.2.255 dev eth2  proto kernel  scope link  src 10.100.2.3

The use of loopback pre-dates the git history, so wondering if someone recalls the reason why. We would like to change that to make it consistent with IPv4 - with a sysctl to maintain backwards compatibility.

Thanks,
David

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ