[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161107.201345.1974283028907025304.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 20:13:45 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mtesar@...hat.com
Cc: kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, jmorris@...ei.org, kaber@...sh.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] igmp: Make igmp group member RFC 3376 compliant
From: Michal Tesar <mtesar@...hat.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 10:38:34 +0100
> 2. If the received Query is a General Query, the interface timer is
> used to schedule a response to the General Query after the
> selected delay. Any previously pending response to a General
> Query is canceled.
> --8<--
>
> Currently the timer is rearmed with new random expiration time for
> every incoming query regardless of possibly already pending report.
> Which is not aligned with the above RFE.
I don't read it that way. #2 says if this is a general query then any
pending response to a general query is cancelled. And that's
effectively what the code is doing right now.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists