lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHo-Oozk1AqqR4+9HxLYSGQOQ8Ohs0NaOx=ZV+94JCH-ftxtMw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Nov 2016 22:14:37 -0800
From:   Maciej Żenczykowski <zenczykowski@...il.com>
To:     Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Cc:     Linux NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>,
        Robert Olsson <robert@...julf.se>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 3/3] qdisc: catch misconfig of attaching qdisc to
 tx_queue_len zero device

Just FYI:

I'm tangentially aware of internal Google code that:
- expects a bonding device running HTB with non-zero txqueuelen
- wants to remove HTB and get a noqueue interface (the normal default
for bonding)

The code currently removes HTB, which gets us to mq, sets txqueuelen
to 0, adds a pfifo, removes the pfifo, which gets us to noqueue.

After this patch this would ?possibly? break (adding pfifo, would
change txqueuelen, so when we remove it we wouldn't end up with
noqueue).

>From what I fuzzily recall, HTB with txquelelen == 0 drops traffic
hard, while pfifo continues to function, hence the ordering...

Obviously our code can be fixed, but I'm worried there's a more
generic backwards compatibility problem here.

(note: this is mostly about 3.11 and 4.3 and might no longer be
relevant with 4.10... maybe the new kernel's default qdisc selection
logic doesn't depend on txqueuelen and checks the flag instead???)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ