netdev - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAM_iQpU1p8aJy_64muXhszzYMzC8AZtRC7+1bB7f4hK+6-rSNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Nov 2016 22:34:11 -0800
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
>
>   net/netlink/genetlink.c
>
> between commit:
>
>   00ffc1ba02d8 ("genetlink: fix a memory leak on error path")
>
> from the net tree and commit:
>
>   2ae0f17df1cd ("genetlink: use idr to track families")
>
> from the net-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Looks good to me.

Thanks!