netdev - [PATCH] bpf: Remove unused but set variables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20161108154028.13334-1-tklauser@distanz.ch>
Date:   Tue,  8 Nov 2016 16:40:28 +0100
From:   Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>
Subject: [PATCH] bpf: Remove unused but set variables

Remove the unused but set variables min_set and max_set in
adjust_reg_min_max_vals to fix the following warning when building with
'W=1':

  kernel/bpf/verifier.c:1483:7: warning: variable ‘min_set’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]

There is no warning about max_set being unused, but since it is only
used in the assignment of min_set it can be removed as well.

They were introduced in commit 484611357c19 ("bpf: allow access into map
value arrays") but seem to have never been used.

Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>
Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 846d7ceaf202..14345be4a2d2 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -1480,7 +1480,6 @@ static void adjust_reg_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 {
 	struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs, *dst_reg;
 	u64 min_val = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE, max_val = BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE;
-	bool min_set = false, max_set = false;
 	u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code);
 
 	dst_reg = &regs[insn->dst_reg];
@@ -1503,7 +1502,6 @@ static void adjust_reg_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 	} else if (insn->imm < BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE &&
 		   (s64)insn->imm > BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE) {
 		min_val = max_val = insn->imm;
-		min_set = max_set = true;
 	}
 
 	/* We don't know anything about what was done to this register, mark it
-- 
2.9.0