[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOrHB_BdYpCpjrzHmNmEkvhXk7u6Gb_1aRyggeCrsL0Jx1nkvw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 10:10:09 -0800
From: Pravin Shelar <pshelar@....org>
To: Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/7] vxlan: simplify exception handling
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:47 AM, Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Nov 2016 19:33:24 -0800, Pravin Shelar wrote:
>> I have moved the dst error handling to vxlan_build_skb(), which is
>> releasing the dst entry.
>
> Hmm, right, I missed that. But it's weird. The previous logic was
> confusing (skb is freed in case of error but not otherwise), I'm with
> you on this change. But having the same confusing logic with dst_entry
> instead doesn't improve things.
>
> Could we free both skb and dst_entry from the caller?
>
I wanted to do same, that is free dst and skb in caller function. But
that would need more changes due to discrepancy in IPv4 udp-tunnel and
IPv6 udp-tunnel api. IPv4 works on route entry and IPv6 needs dst
entry. so If caller frees dst-entry then I need additional variable to
keep track of dst entry which is what I am trying to avoid.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists