netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 04/11] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Abstract stats

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 14 Nov 2016 10:37:36 +1100
From:   Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 04/11] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Abstract stats_snapshot into ops structure

Hi Andrew,

Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> writes:

> +static int mv88e6320_stats_snapshot(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port)
> +{
> +	port = (port + 1) << 5;
> +
> +	return _mv88e6xxx_stats_snapshot(chip, port);
> +}

Please move the above helper in its internal SMI file (port, global1 or
whatever) and keep the below wrapper in chip.c. The correct prefix will
avoid having a _ prefix.

> +static int mv88e6xxx_stats_snapshot(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port)
> +{
> +	if (!chip->info->ops->stats_snapshot)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	return chip->info->ops->stats_snapshot(chip, port);
> +}

[...]

>  static const struct mv88e6xxx_ops mv88e6175_ops = {
> @@ -3223,6 +3243,7 @@ static const struct mv88e6xxx_ops mv88e6175_ops = {
>  	.port_set_duplex = mv88e6xxx_port_set_duplex,
>  	.port_set_rgmii_delay = mv88e6352_port_set_rgmii_delay,
>  	.port_set_speed = mv88e6185_port_set_speed,
> +	.stats_snapshot = mv88e6xxx_stats_snapshot,
>  };

Is this expected? Doesn't look correct to me to use
mv88e6xxx_stats_snapshot here.

Thanks,

        Vivien