lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161113202403.GB18258@lunn.ch>
Date:   Sun, 13 Nov 2016 21:24:03 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/11] Start adding support for mv88e6390 family

On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 12:48:59AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 03:53:32 +0100
> 
> > This is the first patchset implementing support for the mv88e6390
> > family.  This is a new generation of switch devices and has numerous
> > incompatible changes to the registers. These patches allow the switch
> > to the detected during probe, and makes the statistics unit work.
> > 
> > These patches are insufficient to make the mv88e6390 functional. More
> > patches will follow.
> 
> Andrew, this series doesn't apply cleanly to net-next, so you'll
> need to respin.

Hi David

I'm happy to respin, but i'm wondering why the don't apply.

What seems to be the issue is you said you have accepted:

[PATCH net-next 0/2] Fixes for port refactoring
https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=147880114928996&w=1

Yet i don't see these in net-next. And i based this patchset on a tree
which included the fixes. Hence they are not applying.

Have the fixes really been accepted?

Thanks
	Andrew


 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ