[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEbi=3esyRi4cnUNf4uPKCQtyRekBRo81Frd=BSJy8qf=3uc+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 22:26:52 +0800
From: Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ethernet: faraday: To support device tree usage.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 9:47 PM, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 04:43:15PM +0800, Greentime Hu wrote:
>> To support device tree usage for ftmac100.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftmac100.c | 7 +++++++
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftmac100.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftmac100.c
>> index dce5f7b..81dd9e1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftmac100.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftmac100.c
>> @@ -1172,11 +1172,17 @@ static int __exit ftmac100_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static const struct of_device_id mac_of_ids[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "andestech,atmac100" },
>> + { }
>
> andestech is not in
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt Please provide a
> separate patch adding it.
OK. I will provide another patch to add andestech.
> Humm, why andestech? Why not something based around faraday
> technology?
It is because we use the same ftmac100 IP provided from faraday
technology but I am now using it in andestech SoC.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists