netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: ethernet: faraday: To support device tree usage.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161116143715.GH19962@lunn.ch>
Date:   Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:37:15 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ethernet: faraday: To support device tree usage.

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:26:52PM +0800, Greentime Hu wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 9:47 PM, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 04:43:15PM +0800, Greentime Hu wrote:
> >> To support device tree usage for ftmac100.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftmac100.c |    7 +++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftmac100.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftmac100.c
> >> index dce5f7b..81dd9e1 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftmac100.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftmac100.c
> >> @@ -1172,11 +1172,17 @@ static int __exit ftmac100_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>       return 0;
> >>  }
> >>
> >> +static const struct of_device_id mac_of_ids[] = {
> >> +     { .compatible = "andestech,atmac100" },
> >> +     { }
> >
> > andestech is not in
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt Please provide a
> > separate patch adding it.
> OK. I will provide another patch to add andestech.
> 
> > Humm, why andestech? Why not something based around faraday
> > technology?
> It is because we use the same ftmac100 IP provided from faraday
> technology but I am now using it in andestech SoC.

Please make sure you get an acked-by: from the device tree
maintainers. They might want you to use faraday, since that is the
original IP provider. For example, all Synopsys licensed IP uses
"snps,XXX", not the SoC vendor with the license.

	    Andrew