[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1479342849.8455.233.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 16:34:09 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Cc: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@....com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Netperf UDP issue with connected sockets
On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 23:40 +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> Using -R 1 does not seem to help remove __ip_select_ident()
>
> Samples: 56K of event 'cycles', Event count (approx.): 78628132661
> Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol
> + 9.11% netperf [kernel.vmlinux] [k] __ip_select_ident
> + 6.98% netperf [kernel.vmlinux] [k] _raw_spin_lock
> + 6.21% swapper [mlx5_core] [k] mlx5e_poll_tx_cq
> + 5.03% netperf [kernel.vmlinux] [k] copy_user_enhanced_fast_string
> + 4.69% netperf [kernel.vmlinux] [k] __ip_make_skb
> + 4.63% netperf [kernel.vmlinux] [k] skb_set_owner_w
> + 4.15% swapper [kernel.vmlinux] [k] __slab_free
> + 3.80% netperf [mlx5_core] [k] mlx5e_sq_xmit
> + 2.00% swapper [kernel.vmlinux] [k] sock_wfree
> + 1.94% netperf netperf [.] send_data
> + 1.92% netperf netperf [.] send_omni_inner
Check "ss -nu" ?
You will see if sockets are connected (present in ss output or not)
UDP being connected does not prevent __ip_select_ident() being used.
if ((iph->frag_off & htons(IP_DF)) && !skb->ignore_df) {
So you need IP_DF being set, and skb->ignore_df being 0
-> time to try IP_MTU_DISCOVER ;)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists