netdev - Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH net 1/1] net: batman-adv: Treat NET_XMIT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1807277.5c8tsCoh5a@bentobox>
Date:   Mon, 21 Nov 2016 09:31:04 +0100
From:   Sven Eckelmann <sven@...fation.org>
To:     Feng Gao <gfree.wind@...il.com>
Cc:     b.a.t.m.a.n@...ts.open-mesh.org, mareklindner@...mailbox.ch,
        sw@...onwunderlich.de, a@...table.cc,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH net 1/1] net: batman-adv: Treat NET_XMIT_CN as transmit successfully

On Montag, 21. November 2016 16:21:52 CET Feng Gao wrote:
> Hi Sven,
> 
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Sven Eckelmann <sven@...fation.org> wrote:
> > On Montag, 21. November 2016 08:39:39 CET fgao@...ai8.com wrote:
> >> From: Gao Feng <fgao@...ai8.com>
> >>
> >> The tc could return NET_XMIT_CN as one congestion notification, but
> >> it does not mean the packe is lost. Other modules like ipvlan,
> >
> > s/packe/packet/
> 
> What's this mean?

That there is a minor typo (*t* is missing) and this sed statement (when
applied only to the commit message) would fix it.

David already marked this patch as "Under Review" in his patchwork. So I would
guess that he will accept this patch and not the batman-adv maintainers. And
maybe he will fix this small typo - or maybe not.

Kind regards,
	Sven
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)