[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+6hz4rkhhAvDn7e3QtV=-5OTV97ABAsE2yy8o+RnD5GvpuByA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 16:47:09 +0800
From: Feng Gao <gfree.wind@...il.com>
To: Sven Eckelmann <sven@...fation.org>
Cc: b.a.t.m.a.n@...ts.open-mesh.org, mareklindner@...mailbox.ch,
sw@...onwunderlich.de, a@...table.cc,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH net 1/1] net: batman-adv: Treat NET_XMIT_CN
as transmit successfully
Hi Sven,
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Sven Eckelmann <sven@...fation.org> wrote:
> On Montag, 21. November 2016 16:21:52 CET Feng Gao wrote:
>> Hi Sven,
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Sven Eckelmann <sven@...fation.org> wrote:
>> > On Montag, 21. November 2016 08:39:39 CET fgao@...ai8.com wrote:
>> >> From: Gao Feng <fgao@...ai8.com>
>> >>
>> >> The tc could return NET_XMIT_CN as one congestion notification, but
>> >> it does not mean the packe is lost. Other modules like ipvlan,
>> >
>> > s/packe/packet/
>>
>> What's this mean?
>
> That there is a minor typo (*t* is missing) and this sed statement (when
> applied only to the commit message) would fix it.
Thanks. I didn't thought it was sed statement.
>
> David already marked this patch as "Under Review" in his patchwork. So I would
> guess that he will accept this patch and not the batman-adv maintainers. And
> maybe he will fix this small typo - or maybe not.
>
> Kind regards,
> Sven
I would correct the typo in the patch for net-next.
Best Regards
Feng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists