[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161123173230.GD8760@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 18:32:30 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Stefan Eichenberger <stefan.eichenberger@...module.com>
Cc: Stefan Eichenberger <eichest@...il.com>,
vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: forward unknown mc packets on
mv88e6097
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 06:14:41PM +0100, Stefan Eichenberger wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 05:59:49PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 05:54:40PM +0100, Stefan Eichenberger wrote:
> > > Packets with unknown destination addresses are not forwarded to the cpu
> > > port on mv88e6097 based switches (e.g. MV88E6097) at the moment. This
> > > commit enables PORT_CONTROL_FORWARD_UNKNOWN_MC for this family.
> >
> > Please try adding MV88E6XXX_FLAG_EDSA to
> > MV88E6XXX_FLAGS_FAMILY_6097. That is the better fix if it works.
>
> I was even wondering what EDSA means:) Thanks this solved the problem!
Great.
We should fix up a few minor issues and resubmit.
What is the status of the first patch, which added 6097 to the driver?
I don't think David accepted it yet. So lets make one patchset
containing the two patches.
The subject line of the patches need to have net-next in it. e.g.
[PATCH net-next 0/2] Add support for the MV88e6097
Include a cover node, saying what the patchset as a whole does.
This gets used as the merge commit message.
Then the two patches.
When posting the patchset, please start a new thread. A new version of
a patchset or patch should be a new thread.
Thanks
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists