[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1479923212.8455.515.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:46:52 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] mlx4: do not use priv->stats_lock in
mlx4_en_auto_moderation()
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Per RX ring packets/bytes counters are not protected by global
priv->stats_lock.
Better not confuse the reader, and use READ_ONCE() to show we read
these counters without surrounding synchronization.
Interrupt moderation is best effort, and we do not really care of
ultra precise counters.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_netdev.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_netdev.c
index 9a807e93c9fdd81e61e561208aa1480a244d0bdb..b964bdcd4ae509a7e693215e8b32f040218e252c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_netdev.c
@@ -1391,10 +1391,8 @@ static void mlx4_en_auto_moderation(struct mlx4_en_priv *priv)
return;
for (ring = 0; ring < priv->rx_ring_num; ring++) {
- spin_lock_bh(&priv->stats_lock);
- rx_packets = priv->rx_ring[ring]->packets;
- rx_bytes = priv->rx_ring[ring]->bytes;
- spin_unlock_bh(&priv->stats_lock);
+ rx_packets = READ_ONCE(priv->rx_ring[ring]->packets);
+ rx_bytes = READ_ONCE(priv->rx_ring[ring]->bytes);
rx_pkt_diff = ((unsigned long) (rx_packets -
priv->last_moder_packets[ring]));
Powered by blists - more mailing lists