lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 27 Nov 2016 22:32:41 +0100
From:   Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@...ine-koenig.org>,
        Michal Hrusecki <Michal.Hrusecky@....cz>,
        Tomas Hlavacek <tomas.hlavacek@....cz>,
        Bed??icha Ko??atu <bedrich.kosata@....cz>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mv88e6xxx: Fix mv88e6xxx_g1_irq_free() interrupt count

Hi Andrew,

Am 27.11.2016 um 22:22 schrieb Andrew Lunn:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 09:43:44PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> mv88e6xxx_g1_irq_setup() sets up chip->g1_irq.nirqs interrupt mappings,
>> so free the same amount. This will be 8 or 9 in practice, less than 16.
> 
> Hi Andreas
> 
> The patch is correct, but please read
> Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt
> and then resubmit the patch.

Do you mean --subject-prefix="PATCH net-next" or something else?

Thanks,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ