lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 22:39:12 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> To: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@...ine-koenig.org>, Michal Hrusecki <Michal.Hrusecky@....cz>, Tomas Hlavacek <tomas.hlavacek@....cz>, Bed??icha Ko??atu <bedrich.kosata@....cz>, Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mv88e6xxx: Fix mv88e6xxx_g1_irq_free() interrupt count On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 10:32:41PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Am 27.11.2016 um 22:22 schrieb Andrew Lunn: > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 09:43:44PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote: > >> mv88e6xxx_g1_irq_setup() sets up chip->g1_irq.nirqs interrupt mappings, > >> so free the same amount. This will be 8 or 9 in practice, less than 16. > > > > Hi Andreas > > > > The patch is correct, but please read > > Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt > > and then resubmit the patch. > > Do you mean --subject-prefix="PATCH net-next" Yep. Thanks Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists