[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF2d9jhvh1czfp3jDUj8fN1uejsybosOHjHmo=siKVTQJhAXQA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 11:08:03 -0800
From: Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार)
<maheshb@...gle.com>
To: fgao@...ai8.com
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, gfree.wind@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] driver: ipvlan: Add the sanity check for
ipvlan mode
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 5:23 AM, <fgao@...ai8.com> wrote:
> From: Gao Feng <fgao@...ai8.com>
>
> The ipvlan mode variable "nval" is from userspace, so the ipvlan codes
> should check if the mode variable "nval" is valid.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gao Feng <fgao@...ai8.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_main.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_main.c b/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_main.c
> index ab90b22..537b5a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_main.c
> @@ -65,6 +65,9 @@ static int ipvlan_set_port_mode(struct ipvl_port *port, u16 nval)
> struct net_device *mdev = port->dev;
> int err = 0;
>
> + if (nval >= IPVLAN_MODE_MAX)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
I'm curious to know how you encountered this issue? The values are
validated in ipvlan_nl_validate() and it should fail at that time
itself.
> ASSERT_RTNL();
> if (port->mode != nval) {
> if (nval == IPVLAN_MODE_L3S) {
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists