netdev - Re: [PATCH] debugfs: improve formatting of debugfs_real

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 29 Nov 2016 12:11:37 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Nicolai Stange <nicstange@...il.com>,
        Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] debugfs: improve formatting of debugfs_real_fops()

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 05:23:49PM +0000, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> Type of debugfs_real_fops() is longer than parameters and
>> the name, so there is no way to break the declaration nicely.
>> We have to go over 80 characters.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/debugfs.h | 3 +--
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Doesn't apply to my tree, what did you make this against?

net-next, sorry, it

Fixes: 68f929ff2654 ("debugfs: constify argument to debugfs_real_fops()")

I think that change still haven't propagated out of Dave's tree.  Dave
didn't take my fix up patch, though, so my plan was to resend it to
you during the merge window?  Would that make sense?