[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161130.101349.1062107841922687589.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 10:13:49 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: yegorslists@...glemail.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
grygorii.strashko@...com, mugunthanvnm@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpsw: ethtool: add support for nway reset
From: Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@...glemail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 10:31:30 +0100
> Hi David,
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:41 AM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>> From: yegorslists@...glemail.com
>> Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 10:47:52 +0100
>>
>>> From: Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@...glemail.com>
>>>
>>> This patch adds support for ethtool's '-r' command. Restarting
>>> N-WAY negotiation can be useful to activate newly changed EEE
>>> settings etc.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@...glemail.com>
>>
>> This doesn't apply cleanly to net-next.
>
> My previous patch [1] doesn't show up in net-next. This could explain,
> why nway patch doesn't apply.
> Should I resend them both as series?
>
> [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=148036822211869&w=2
My bad, I sorted this out and applied the nway-reset patch too.
Sorry about that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists