[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGm1_ktxyxVxYdF0Aq-Nv2rVGjEccPsGRZSXHBOE9egybiV1Lg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 10:31:30 +0100
From: Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@...glemail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
"N, Mugunthan V" <mugunthanvnm@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpsw: ethtool: add support for nway reset
Hi David,
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:41 AM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: yegorslists@...glemail.com
> Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 10:47:52 +0100
>
>> From: Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@...glemail.com>
>>
>> This patch adds support for ethtool's '-r' command. Restarting
>> N-WAY negotiation can be useful to activate newly changed EEE
>> settings etc.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@...glemail.com>
>
> This doesn't apply cleanly to net-next.
My previous patch [1] doesn't show up in net-next. This could explain,
why nway patch doesn't apply.
Should I resend them both as series?
[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=148036822211869&w=2
Yegor
Powered by blists - more mailing lists