[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161205072820.GB10204@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 15:28:21 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Bob Copeland <me@...copeland.com>,
Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
David Decotigny <decot@...glers.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [v3 PATCH] netlink: Do not schedule work from sk_destruct
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 03:26:00PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 03:19:46PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the patch. It'll obviously work but I wanted avoid that
> > because it penalises the common path for the rare case.
> >
> > Andrey, please try this patch and let me know if it's any better.
> >
> > ---8<---
> > Subject: netlink: Do not schedule work from sk_destruct
>
> Crap, I screwed it up again. Here is a v2 which moves the atomic
> call into the RCU callback as otherwise the socket can be freed from
> another path while we await the RCU callback.
With the move it no longer makes sense to rename deferred_put_nlk_sk
so here is v3 which restores the original name.
---8<---
It is wrong to schedule a work from sk_destruct using the socket
as the memory reserve because the socket will be freed immediately
after the return from sk_destruct.
Instead we should do the deferral prior to sk_free.
This patch does just that.
Fixes: 707693c8a498 ("netlink: Call cb->done from a worker thread")
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
index 602e5eb..246f29d 100644
--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
@@ -322,11 +322,13 @@ static void netlink_skb_set_owner_r(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk)
sk_mem_charge(sk, skb->truesize);
}
-static void __netlink_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk)
+static void netlink_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk)
{
struct netlink_sock *nlk = nlk_sk(sk);
if (nlk->cb_running) {
+ if (nlk->cb.done)
+ nlk->cb.done(&nlk->cb);
module_put(nlk->cb.module);
kfree_skb(nlk->cb.skb);
}
@@ -348,21 +350,7 @@ static void netlink_sock_destruct_work(struct work_struct *work)
struct netlink_sock *nlk = container_of(work, struct netlink_sock,
work);
- nlk->cb.done(&nlk->cb);
- __netlink_sock_destruct(&nlk->sk);
-}
-
-static void netlink_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk)
-{
- struct netlink_sock *nlk = nlk_sk(sk);
-
- if (nlk->cb_running && nlk->cb.done) {
- INIT_WORK(&nlk->work, netlink_sock_destruct_work);
- schedule_work(&nlk->work);
- return;
- }
-
- __netlink_sock_destruct(sk);
+ sk_free(&nlk->sk);
}
/* This lock without WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE is good on UP and it is _very_ bad on
@@ -667,8 +655,18 @@ static int netlink_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int protocol,
static void deferred_put_nlk_sk(struct rcu_head *head)
{
struct netlink_sock *nlk = container_of(head, struct netlink_sock, rcu);
+ struct sock *sk = &nlk->sk;
+
+ if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&sk->sk_refcnt))
+ return;
+
+ if (nlk->cb_running && nlk->cb.done) {
+ INIT_WORK(&nlk->work, netlink_sock_destruct_work);
+ schedule_work(&nlk->work);
+ return;
+ }
- sock_put(&nlk->sk);
+ sk_free(sk);
}
static int netlink_release(struct socket *sock)
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists