netdev - Re: [v3 PATCH] netlink: Do not schedule work from sk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAeHK+wCUM6px8MojCQor28goaNi9k7iAAN-e-EB1e2YFaZo7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Dec 2016 12:51:56 +0100
From:   Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
To:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:     Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Bob Copeland <me@...copeland.com>,
        Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
        David Decotigny <decot@...glers.com>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
        syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [v3 PATCH] netlink: Do not schedule work from sk_destruct

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 03:26:00PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 03:19:46PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
>> >
>> > Thanks for the patch.  It'll obviously work but I wanted avoid that
>> > because it penalises the common path for the rare case.
>> >
>> > Andrey, please try this patch and let me know if it's any better.
>> >
>> > ---8<---
>> > Subject: netlink: Do not schedule work from sk_destruct
>>
>> Crap, I screwed it up again.  Here is a v2 which moves the atomic
>> call into the RCU callback as otherwise the socket can be freed from
>> another path while we await the RCU callback.
>
> With the move it no longer makes sense to rename deferred_put_nlk_sk
> so here is v3 which restores the original name.
>
> ---8<---
> It is wrong to schedule a work from sk_destruct using the socket
> as the memory reserve because the socket will be freed immediately
> after the return from sk_destruct.
>
> Instead we should do the deferral prior to sk_free.
>
> This patch does just that.
>
> Fixes: 707693c8a498 ("netlink: Call cb->done from a worker thread")
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
>
> diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
> index 602e5eb..246f29d 100644
> --- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
> +++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
> @@ -322,11 +322,13 @@ static void netlink_skb_set_owner_r(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk)
>         sk_mem_charge(sk, skb->truesize);
>  }
>
> -static void __netlink_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk)
> +static void netlink_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk)
>  {
>         struct netlink_sock *nlk = nlk_sk(sk);
>
>         if (nlk->cb_running) {
> +               if (nlk->cb.done)
> +                       nlk->cb.done(&nlk->cb);
>                 module_put(nlk->cb.module);
>                 kfree_skb(nlk->cb.skb);
>         }
> @@ -348,21 +350,7 @@ static void netlink_sock_destruct_work(struct work_struct *work)
>         struct netlink_sock *nlk = container_of(work, struct netlink_sock,
>                                                 work);
>
> -       nlk->cb.done(&nlk->cb);
> -       __netlink_sock_destruct(&nlk->sk);
> -}
> -
> -static void netlink_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk)
> -{
> -       struct netlink_sock *nlk = nlk_sk(sk);
> -
> -       if (nlk->cb_running && nlk->cb.done) {
> -               INIT_WORK(&nlk->work, netlink_sock_destruct_work);
> -               schedule_work(&nlk->work);
> -               return;
> -       }
> -
> -       __netlink_sock_destruct(sk);
> +       sk_free(&nlk->sk);
>  }
>
>  /* This lock without WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE is good on UP and it is _very_ bad on
> @@ -667,8 +655,18 @@ static int netlink_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int protocol,
>  static void deferred_put_nlk_sk(struct rcu_head *head)
>  {
>         struct netlink_sock *nlk = container_of(head, struct netlink_sock, rcu);
> +       struct sock *sk = &nlk->sk;
> +
> +       if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&sk->sk_refcnt))
> +               return;
> +
> +       if (nlk->cb_running && nlk->cb.done) {
> +               INIT_WORK(&nlk->work, netlink_sock_destruct_work);
> +               schedule_work(&nlk->work);
> +               return;
> +       }
>
> -       sock_put(&nlk->sk);
> +       sk_free(sk);
>  }
>
>  static int netlink_release(struct socket *sock)
> --
> Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
> PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Hi Herbert,

Tested the last version of your patch, the reports go away.

Thanks for the fix!

Tested-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>