[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 10:03:33 -0500
From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To: Volodymyr Bendiuga <volodymyr.bendiuga@...il.com>, andrew@...n.ch,
f.fainelli@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
volodymyr.bendiuga@...termo.se
Cc: Volodymyr Bendiuga <volodymyr.bendiuga@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net:dsa:mv88e6xxx: use hashtable to store multicast entries
Hi Volodymyr,
Volodymyr Bendiuga <volodymyr.bendiuga@...il.com> writes:
> Hashtable will make it extremely faster when inserting fdb entries
> into the forwarding database.
This is hard to follow. As Andrew correctly mentioned, when you have two
or more patches, please format them with --cover-letter, describe them
in patch 0 and send them all together, so that we get a single thread.
You are correct about the ATU get operations being slow. However, we
intentionally keep the driver stateless at the moment to keep it simple.
Unless speed is an issue to fix here, I am quite reluctant to add
caching to this driver yet. What is the issue you are having with the
ATU being slow?
Thanks,
Vivien
Powered by blists - more mailing lists