netdev - Re: stmmac driver...

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8d624fd3-8440-5b8a-ee8d-558a671eec60@synopsys.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Dec 2016 12:05:50 +0800
From:   Jie Deng <Jie.Deng1@...opsys.com>
To:     Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <alexandre.torgue@...com>
CC:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: stmmac driver...

Hi Peppe,

On 2016/12/12 22:17, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
> Hi David
>
> On 12/7/2016 7:06 PM, David Miller wrote:
>>
>> Giuseppe and Alexandre,
>>
>> There are a lot of patches and discussions happening around the stammc
>> driver lately and both of you are listed as the maintainers.
>>
>> I really need prompt and conclusive reviews of these patch submissions
>> from you, and participation in all discussions about the driver.
>
> yes we are trying to do the best.
>
>> Otherwise I have only three things I can do: 1) let the patches rot in
>> patchwork for days 2) trust that the patches are sane and fit your
>> desires and goals and just apply them or 3) reject them since they
>> aren't being reviewed properly.
>
> at this stage, I think the best is: (3).
I think the patches David mentioned also included XLGMAC. He sent this email
before I explained QoS and XLGMAC were different IPs. Do you mind we do XLGMAC
development under drivers/net/ethernet/synopsys/ ? I think we don't have
conflict since we will keep QoS development in stmmac.
>
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
> you are welcome
>
>
> Peppe