netdev - Re: stmmac driver...

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d8d00654-a07e-2992-a911-3b88f1d3d3ac@st.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Dec 2016 08:33:13 +0100
From:   Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@...com>
To:     Jie Deng <Jie.Deng1@...opsys.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <alexandre.torgue@...com>
CC:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: stmmac driver...

Hello Jie

On 12/14/2016 5:05 AM, Jie Deng wrote:
> Hi Peppe,
>
> On 2016/12/12 22:17, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
>> Hi David
>>
>> On 12/7/2016 7:06 PM, David Miller wrote:
>>>
>>> Giuseppe and Alexandre,
>>>
>>> There are a lot of patches and discussions happening around the stammc
>>> driver lately and both of you are listed as the maintainers.
>>>
>>> I really need prompt and conclusive reviews of these patch submissions
>>> from you, and participation in all discussions about the driver.
>>
>> yes we are trying to do the best.
>>
>>> Otherwise I have only three things I can do: 1) let the patches rot in
>>> patchwork for days 2) trust that the patches are sane and fit your
>>> desires and goals and just apply them or 3) reject them since they
>>> aren't being reviewed properly.
>>
>> at this stage, I think the best is: (3).
> I think the patches David mentioned also included XLGMAC. He sent this email
> before I explained QoS and XLGMAC were different IPs. Do you mind we do XLGMAC
> development under drivers/net/ethernet/synopsys/ ? I think we don't have
> conflict since we will keep QoS development in stmmac.

Great. Many thanks for the clarification :-)

Regards
Peppe

>>
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>
>> you are welcome
>>
>>
>> Peppe
>
>