[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161215093657.00925c10@xeon-e3>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 09:36:57 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: "Vishwanathapura, Niranjana" <niranjana.vishwanathapura@...el.com>
Cc: dledford@...hat.com, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, dennis.dalessandro@...el.com,
ira.weiny@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 02/10] IB/hfi-vnic: Virtual Network Interface
Controller (VNIC) interface
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:53:49 -0800
"Vishwanathapura, Niranjana" <niranjana.vishwanathapura@...el.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 11:59:34PM -0800, Vishwanathapura, Niranjana wrote:
> >+
> >+static inline bool is_hfi_ibdev(struct ib_device *ibdev)
> >+{
> >+ return !memcmp(ibdev->name, "hfi", 3);
> >+}
>
> I am thinking of adding a device capability flag to indicate HFI VNIC capabilty
> instead of relying on the device name as above to identify a hfi ib deice.
> Any comments? Probably it can be addressed by a separate patch later.
>
> Niranjana
>
> >
Agreed. device name can change at anytime.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists