[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161221200612.GM13857@orbyte.nwl.cc>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 21:06:12 +0100
From: Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, sd@...asysnail.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] net: dummy: Introduce dummy virtual functions
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 01:32:00PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 23:26:21 +0100
>
> > The idea for this was born when testing VF support in iproute2 which was
> > impeded by hardware requirements. In fact, not every VF-capable hardware
> > driver implements all netdev ops, so testing the interface is still hard
> > to do even with a well-sorted hardware shelf.
> >
> > To overcome this and allow for testing the user-kernel interface, this
> > patch allows to turn dummy into a PF with a configurable amount of VFs.
> >
> > Due to the assumption that all PFs are PCI devices, this implementation
> > is not completely straightforward: In order to allow for
> > rtnl_fill_ifinfo() to see the dummy VFs, a fake PCI parent device is
> > attached to the dummy netdev. This has to happen at the right spot so
> > register_netdevice() does not get confused. This patch abuses
> > ndo_fix_features callback for that. In ndo_uninit callback, the fake
> > parent is removed again for the same purpose.
> >
> > Joint work with Sabrina Dubroca.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
>
> Please resubmit when net-next opens back up, thanks.
Sure, thanks for the heads-up!
Cheers, Phil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists