[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <586E9A0F.1020002@iogearbox.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 20:10:07 +0100
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: davem@...emloft.net, sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com,
willemb@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] packet: fix panic in __packet_set_timestamp
on tpacket_v3 in tx mode
On 01/05/2017 07:27 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-01-05 at 02:34 +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
[...]
>> diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c
>> index 7e39087..ddbda25 100644
>> --- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
>> +++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
>> @@ -481,6 +481,9 @@ static __u32 __packet_set_timestamp(struct packet_sock *po, void *frame,
>> h.h2->tp_nsec = ts.tv_nsec;
>> break;
>> case TPACKET_V3:
>> + h.h3->tp_sec = ts.tv_sec;
>> + h.h3->tp_nsec = ts.tv_nsec;
>> + break;
>> default:
>> WARN(1, "TPACKET version not supported.\n");
>> BUG();
>
> Gosh. Can we also replace this BUG() into something less aggressive ?
There are currently 5 of these WARN() + BUG() constructs and 1 BUG()-only
for the 'default' TPACKET version spread all over af_packet, so probably
makes sense to rather make all of them less aggressive.
> diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c
> index b9e1a13b4ba36a0bc7edf6a8c2c116c7d48c970c..0c0d268544787dcbef6601c5014e7d3836d16f96 100644
> --- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
> +++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
> @@ -476,9 +476,11 @@ static __u32 __packet_set_timestamp(struct packet_sock *po, void *frame,
> h.h2->tp_nsec = ts.tv_nsec;
> break;
> case TPACKET_V3:
> + h.h3->tp_sec = ts.tv_sec;
> + h.h3->tp_nsec = ts.tv_nsec;
> + break;
> default:
> - WARN(1, "TPACKET version not supported.\n");
> - BUG();
> + pr_err_once("TPACKET version %u not supported.\n", po->tp_version);
> }
>
> /* one flush is safe, as both fields always lie on the same cacheline */
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists