netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] packet: fix panic in __packet_set_timestamp on tpacket

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAsGZS59KsGHJzG-U962kK4AP+M40zAV-ERgDqYvDLz5JB6Exg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 6 Mar 2017 09:13:29 -0800
From:   chetan loke <loke.chetan@...il.com>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com, willemb@...gle.com,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] packet: fix panic in __packet_set_timestamp on
 tpacket_v3 in tx mode

>>
>> Gosh. Can we also replace this BUG() into something less aggressive ?
>
>
> There are currently 5 of these WARN() + BUG() constructs and 1 BUG()-only
> for the 'default' TPACKET version spread all over af_packet, so probably
> makes sense to rather make all of them less aggressive.
>
>

Very few consumers actually go looking in the kernel logs to see the
error-warnings and report them back here.

This severity will get them to report the incident which in this case
got fixed??