netdev - [PATCH net 1/1] net/af_iucv: don't use paged skbs for TX on HiperSockets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170110161034.82445-2-ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 Jan 2017 17:10:34 +0100
From:   Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        schwidefsky@...ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, ubraun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH net 1/1] net/af_iucv: don't use paged skbs for TX on HiperSockets

From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

With commit e53743994e21
("af_iucv: use paged SKBs for big outbound messages"),
we transmit paged skbs for both of AF_IUCV's transport modes
(IUCV or HiperSockets).
The qeth driver for Layer 3 HiperSockets currently doesn't
support NETIF_F_SG, so these skbs would just be linearized again
by the stack.
Avoid that overhead by using paged skbs only for IUCV transport.

cc stable, since this also circumvents a significant skb leak when
sending large messages (where the skb then needs to be linearized).

Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v4.8+
Fixes: e53743994e21 ("af_iucv: use paged SKBs for big outbound messages")
---
 net/iucv/af_iucv.c | 25 ++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/iucv/af_iucv.c b/net/iucv/af_iucv.c
index cfb9e5f..13190b3 100644
--- a/net/iucv/af_iucv.c
+++ b/net/iucv/af_iucv.c
@@ -1044,7 +1044,8 @@ static int iucv_sock_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
 {
 	struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
 	struct iucv_sock *iucv = iucv_sk(sk);
-	size_t headroom, linear;
+	size_t headroom = 0;
+	size_t linear;
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 	struct iucv_message txmsg = {0};
 	struct cmsghdr *cmsg;
@@ -1122,18 +1123,20 @@ static int iucv_sock_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
 	 * this is fine for SOCK_SEQPACKET (unless we want to support
 	 * segmented records using the MSG_EOR flag), but
 	 * for SOCK_STREAM we might want to improve it in future */
-	headroom = (iucv->transport == AF_IUCV_TRANS_HIPER)
-		   ? sizeof(struct af_iucv_trans_hdr) + ETH_HLEN : 0;
-	if (headroom + len < PAGE_SIZE) {
+	if (iucv->transport == AF_IUCV_TRANS_HIPER) {
+		headroom = sizeof(struct af_iucv_trans_hdr) + ETH_HLEN;
 		linear = len;
 	} else {
-		/* In nonlinear "classic" iucv skb,
-		 * reserve space for iucv_array
-		 */
-		if (iucv->transport != AF_IUCV_TRANS_HIPER)
-			headroom += sizeof(struct iucv_array) *
-				    (MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1);
-		linear = PAGE_SIZE - headroom;
+		if (len < PAGE_SIZE) {
+			linear = len;
+		} else {
+			/* In nonlinear "classic" iucv skb,
+			 * reserve space for iucv_array
+			 */
+			headroom = sizeof(struct iucv_array) *
+				   (MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1);
+			linear = PAGE_SIZE - headroom;
+		}
 	}
 	skb = sock_alloc_send_pskb(sk, headroom + linear, len - linear,
 				   noblock, &err, 0);
-- 
2.8.4